Government Needs to Back Off on Jobs

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ATF Consumer

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 23, 2008
    4,628
    36
    South Side Indy
    Government Needs to Back Off on Jobs

    By Peter Schiff



    Once again, the big government policies of President Obama and the Democrats in Congress have kicked the American worker while he's down. Today's release of December non-farm payrolls revealed that another 85,000 Americans lost their jobs. With the official unemployment rate at 10% and the unofficial rate (which includes discouraged and underemployed workers) topping 17%, the job prospects for the newly unemployed continues to be bleak.

    More significantly, we continue to replace manufacturing jobs with less productive service-sector jobs. Not only does this lower the wages of working Americans, but it forces the trade deficit higher -- further undermining our economy, lowering the value of our dollar and diminishing our standard of living. Real job growth will not return until government removes the obstacles that prevent small businesses from expanding. Washington must end its assault on capital formation, entrepreneurship and profits. With more regulations and higher taxes, government effectively places a heavy tax on job creation, which is why so many are now unemployed. The oldest axiom of economics is:if you want less of something, tax it.
    Furthermore, government must stop spending. By borrowing so much of our scarce savings, it is crowding the private sector out of the credit markets. More importantly, all the money being printed to finance government "stimulus" spending ensures that even those who manage to keep their jobs will find it harder to make ends meet as inflation erodes the purchasing power of their wages.
    We must resist the calls for government jobs programs. Such programs simply replace the more productive jobs that might otherwise have been created by the private sector with make-work tasks like paving unnecessary highways or, worse, "community organizing." This makes the economy less efficient in serving the demands of consumers, driving prices higher and placing even more jobs in jeopardy.

    I think our current elected officials are too drunk on themselves to come to any of this logic.
     

    UltraRick

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 19, 2009
    467
    18
    Georgetown
    I had a job making good money before he was elected (not by me). I was permently layed of in May and am still looking for the right job.
     

    irishfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    5,647
    38
    in your head
    So everybody in this thread who voted for Bush who keeps saying they didn't help elect Obama are guilty of voting in the man who let this all start on his watch correct? I am not saying Obama is handling this well because obviously he is not but lets not forget who was in charge when this started even though the GOP has went crazy trying to spin this.
     

    Jay

    Gotta watch us old guys.....cause if you don't....
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 19, 2008
    2,903
    38
    Near Marion, IN
    So everybody in this thread who voted for Bush who keeps saying they didn't help elect Obama are guilty of voting in the man who let this all start on his watch correct? I am not saying Obama is handling this well because obviously he is not but lets not forget who was in charge when this started even though the GOP has went crazy trying to spin this.


    Sorry sir, but the jobs debacle began with the passage of NAFTA, on January 1, 1994....... let's see..... hmmmm, yep CLINTON got that done for ya. Nice try, though.

    Bush was far from perfect, but he wasn't a socialist, who has mortgaged this country a55hole deep for the next 75 years, if not more. bam-bam has screwed up more in his first 6 months than Bush did in 8 years...... remember to think kindly of your new messiah, on your way to the poor house.

    Since bam-bam "restructured" the finance industry, with OUR MONEY, be sure and pay attention to the bonuses being paid by the financial biggies....BILLIONS... Your pet socialist brought change, all right...he's changing us from a world leader to another 3rd world wanna be.
     
    Last edited:

    ATF Consumer

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 23, 2008
    4,628
    36
    South Side Indy
    So everybody in this thread who voted for Bush who keeps saying they didn't help elect Obama are guilty of voting in the man who let this all start on his watch correct? I am not saying Obama is handling this well because obviously he is not but lets not forget who was in charge when this started even though the GOP has went crazy trying to spin this.

    That's right. Bush was a closet progressive. We all learned this just a little too late.
     

    Kick

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Jan 4, 2010
    5,930
    38
    Illinois
    Wow, 17% actual unemployment/underemployment rate.... That means that just shy of 1 in every 5 people are not making ends meet. It just blows my mind how some politicians can sit back and say that things are going to get better before they get worse. HOW MUCH WORSE CAN IT GET??????
     

    irishfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    5,647
    38
    in your head
    Sorry sir, but the jobs debacle began with the passage of NAFTA, on January 1, 1994....... let's see..... hmmmm, yep CLINTON got that done for ya. Nice try, though.

    Bush was far from perfect, but he wasn't a socialist, who has mortgaged this country a55hole deep for the next 75 years, if not more. bam-bam has screwed up more in his first 6 months than Bush did in 8 years...... remember to think kindly of your new messiah, on your way to the poor house.

    Since bam-bam "restructured" the finance industry, with OUR MONEY, be sure and pay attention to the bonuses being paid by the financial biggies....BILLIONS... Your pet socialist brought change, all right...he's changing us from a world leader to another 3rd world wanna be.

    Um nice try yourself but why don't you tell the FULL TRUTH. NAFTA was the baby of George Bush Sr. Also, it began first with the Canada-United States free trade agreement in 1988. Who was in charge then? Also, NAFTA was going to be the legacy of George H.W. Bush but didn't get it passed before he was voted out of office. Also, BOTH republican senators from Indiana at the time voted YEA for NAFTA so I guess the local republicans were looking out for Indiana just as much as the democrats. Now, I am not saying Clinton didn't sell us out for signing the agreement after he said he would not sign because that is exactly what he did. You can now blame Obama all you want but George W. Bush is equally responsible for everything that is happening.:patriot:

    As far as your comment about Obama screwing up more in 6 months than Bush did in 8 years....well mission accomplished in Iraq was May 1, 2003 correct? Why is the military still doing operations there? How many troops killed since the declaration? Also, the economy tanked in his last year of office so I am guessing that quite a few jobs were lost during that time so I would say he didn't do to well there and at best equal to Obama's first year. The list can go on forever when it comes to the mistakes almost any president has made as well as the spinning from biased people to try and make the "other guy" look worse. I do not like what Obama is doing or am I a fan of the man but I don't see how trying to play up the GOP when they have done just as much to cause these problems helps any of us. They are all equally guilty.
     
    Last edited:

    Jay

    Gotta watch us old guys.....cause if you don't....
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 19, 2008
    2,903
    38
    Near Marion, IN
    How much financial strife was caused by the Bush family vs. what financial strife is being heaped upon us now, at the hands of osama?

    bam-bam didn't invent socialism, either, but he sure as hell is implementing it, isn't he? ....and that implementation was HIS choice....just like implementation of NAFTA was the choice of Clinton.
     
    Rating - 100%
    137   0   0
    Jan 28, 2009
    3,759
    113
    Um nice try yourself but why don't you tell the FULL TRUTH. NAFTA was the baby of George Bush Sr. Also, it began first with the Canada-United States free trade agreement in 1988. Who was in charge then? Also, NAFTA was going to be the legacy of George H.W. Bush but didn't get it passed before he was voted out of office. Also, BOTH republican senators from Indiana at the time voted YEA for NAFTA so I guess the local republicans were looking out for Indiana just as much as the democrats. Now, I am not saying Clinton didn't sell us out for signing the agreement after he said he would not sign because that is exactly what he did. You can now blame Obama all you want but George W. Bush is equally responsible for everything that is happening.:patriot:

    As far as your comment about Obama screwing up more in 6 months than Bush did in 8 years....well mission accomplished in Iraq was May 1, 2003 correct? Why is the military still doing operations there? How many troops killed since the declaration? Also, the economy tanked in his last year of office so I am guessing that quite a few jobs were lost during that time so I would say he didn't do to well there and at best equal to Obama's first year. The list can go on forever when it comes to the mistakes almost any president has made as well as the spinning from biased people to try and make the "other guy" look worse. I do not like what Obama is doing or am I a fan of the man but I don't see how trying to play up the GOP when they have done just as much to cause these problems helps any of us. They are all equally guilty.
    Can you tell us who took control of the House and Senate 2 years before everything tanked in 2008?:scratch::dunno:
     

    djl02

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Sep 18, 2009
    1,406
    36
    Indiana
    history.gif
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,287
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Today Senator Freeman announced his "Get the %^$#@ Government Out of the Way Act of 2010" which will:

    1. Abolish the capital gains tax
    2. Slash Corporate Income Tax by 50%

    The CBO projects an employment rate of 138% (people would be working multiple jobs) within 30 days.
     

    lashicoN

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 2, 2009
    2,130
    38
    North
    How much financial strife was caused by the Bush family vs. what financial strife is being heaped upon us now, at the hands of osama? quote]

    Are you talking about September 11th 2001? I don't know that Osama cost us any money from the attacks, apart from reconstruction on the Pentagon. Weren't the twin towers privately owned? I fail to see what your point is, Osama is the cause of our crashing economy? I doubt it.


    I'm willing to bet that this election Republicans will mop the floor with the Democratic party and will take the majority. Then after two years of doing nothing the Democratic party will have all the answers and will sweep the house and senate. Then two years of doing nothing the Republicans will look like a brand new penny again. Do you see what I'm getting at? They are all equally honest, gracious, intelligent, American, and productive. Equal in the sense that nearly everyone from either party is only looking out for number one's bank account. It appears to me that nothing has changed from the passing of the torch from Bush to Obama. We have been on a steady course straight down and it isn't one man or both men's fault alone. There are plenty of CEOs, congressman, aids, staff-members, and lobbyist to blame. It's just much easier to point at Bush or Obama and shout "LIAR" or throw a shoe at him.
     

    irishfan

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 30, 2009
    5,647
    38
    in your head
    Can you tell us who took control of the House and Senate 2 years before everything tanked in 2008?:scratch::dunno:

    Can you tell us what party the President of the United States was in during those two years? How many bills did he veto that relate to the recession? You can blame the dems who took over congress but the man who signs the bills and makes them law was a republican:dunno:
     

    djl02

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Sep 18, 2009
    1,406
    36
    Indiana
    How much financial strife was caused by the Bush family vs. what financial strife is being heaped upon us now, at the hands of osama? quote]

    Are you talking about September 11th 2001? I don't know that Osama cost us any money from the attacks, apart from reconstruction on the Pentagon. Weren't the twin towers privately owned? I fail to see what your point is, Osama is the cause of our crashing economy? I doubt it.


    I'm willing to bet that this election Republicans will mop the floor with the Democratic party and will take the majority. Then after two years of doing nothing the Democratic party will have all the answers and will sweep the house and senate. Then two years of doing nothing the Republicans will look like a brand new penny again. Do you see what I'm getting at? They are all equally honest, gracious, intelligent, American, and productive. Equal in the sense that nearly everyone from either party is only looking out for number one's bank account. It appears to me that nothing has changed from the passing of the torch from Bush to Obama. We have been on a steady course straight down and it isn't one man or both men's fault alone. There are plenty of CEOs, congressman, aids, staff-members, and lobbyist to blame. It's just much easier to point at Bush or Obama and shout "LIAR" or throw a shoe at him.

    AMEN
     
    Top Bottom