I predict they will sell a cubic buttload of these.
Is a cubic buttload more than a metric buttload?
Is buttload a standard or metric unit?
I will reserve an opinion until I see/hear something from a more reliable source.
Why would they go 380 and not 9mm? Silly if you ask me.
It doesn't surprise me that it's a .380 for the simple fact that it's becoming a fairly popular cc and bug round. Lotta people are getting .380's nowadays even with the small form factor single stack 9's out there. I'm disappointed by the round count. I'll stick to my bersa.
seems like more people are looking for sub/ultra compact 9's instead of .380's now. Obviously when guns like the Ruger LCP, and Kahr p380 and a few others came out there was big clamor for .380's. Fast forward to today's market and it seems 9mm's are the in thing...You have the Ruger LC9, Beretta Nano, Kahr cm/pm 9's, S&W shields and XDs's coming out in the last couple of years...and those are just the few I could think of off the top of my head, I know I am missing a couple.Is there a huge market to support a NEW .380 ?
I searched Glock 42 and found this
BREAKING: GLOCK 42 Revealed? | The Truth About Guns
The 42 would be a good carry for when I need to use my ankle holster. I currently have a KelTec P3AT for when I can't easily conceal and at the range it performs well but a Glock in the same caliber would be great.
A Glock 9mm single stack could be called the G19s.