With respect, unclear? Could not be anymore clear.
The dude murdered people including a LEO sitting in his car just prior to the police surrounding the cabin.
You don't have to let the mad dog out of the cage before you shoot it. You kill it in the cage by whatever means you think are best, following the Four Rules.
If the criticism is about endangering innocents with the use of thermite grenades to start a fire, well, I have yet to see that. If there is a concern that we are not aware of then that may change the fact pattern and my conclusion.
If no concern for Rule 4, burn him, shoot him, gas him, send in Chompy and gang, makes no legal difference.
Mad dogs aren't guaranteed trials in courts of law before their lives are snuffed by the state either. I don't have a problem with Dorner's death. It was a foregone conclusion one way or the other. But I do have a problem with justifying the "wanted: dead or dead" hunt by saying that Dorner did really bad things.
Because death before conviction before a trial is the wrong order of events.
Gives new meaning to the "Don't commit a crime" argument, though. Especially in LA.