I would not expect a word for word plagiarism. It looks more like something that came down from corporate.If those broadcasts are contemporaneous, then I don't think you can discount the existence of a single source for material and wording that they were all drawing from. If the broadcasts cover a number of days, a copy cat effect might be more likely
I thought we were a Constitutional Republic.
In 5G, television will connect itself to the internet
I thought we were a Constitutional Republic.
When I have to replace my current HDTV that has no mic or camera and am forced to buy a new one I will likely have to open it up and physically de-solder the mic/camera connections and the 5g modem.
I refuse to let a spying device into my home. I won't let any of those "smart speakers" like amazon/google, or ring security cams anywhere near my home (even though we already carry them in our pockets in the form of smartphones which have software defined functions easily hacked).
It's already even worse than Mr. Orwell could imagine in 1984.
Even though my career/livelyhood depends on IT & computers, I am sorta hoping for another Carrington Event (solar mass ejection) to fry all technology into oblivion and start over.
Right there with you. I've had a Faraday pouch for my cell phone ever since they began talking about monitoring social distancing via the woefully inaccurate Bluetooth signal strength methods in order to contact trace and impose quarantines. I have the phone with me in the grocery, but it is radio isolated. I check texts before and after. Going back in for a forgotten item isn't really terribly inconvenient
The question always seems to bcome down to, am I paranoid enough
An admittedly cursory DuckDuckGo search on "Sinclair Broadcast Group" seems to indicate that it is a media conglomerate that is accused of "right wing bias".Media bias is a myth I have been told.
Makes you wonder who is giving the media it's talking points... (we know)
Oh but Trunews is tru.An admittedly cursory DuckDuckGo search on "Sinclair Broadcast Group" seems to indicate that it is a media conglomerate that is accused of "right wing bias".
Also, that this echo chamber denunciation of fake news was indeed a script mandated, in March of 2018, by corporate to be read on the air by each affiliate.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sinclair-broadcast-group/
My point? Both sides have their biased outlets, and one should always have a supply of salt grains when consuming their respective products. Assuming, of course, that one can trust the source of these allegations.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Since I don't post here much, this may may be hard to believe, but on most topics, I consider myself to be to the political right of most people around here.Oh but Trunews is tru.
I used to believe much of the breathless stories about evidence which will send Clinton to prison,
I used to believe much of the breathless stories about evidence... ...iron-clad proof of voter fraud which will result in Trump being victorious. And invariably, true though they might be, the stories end up being less than farts in the wind.
And much of it was true, but the republicans lacked the balls to see it through. Your beef is not with the sources of that information it is those responsible to do something about it...
^This. Far too often, the problem with the Republicans are in not carrying through with their stated policies. Hate them as much as you want, but when they have a path to do it, Democrats have far less of a problem actually following up and enacting their policies.
That tendency towards not living up to their word is why Trump had such a hard time implementing long-standing Republican policies.
I question Media Bias' lack of bias, I looked at the least biased page and ABC7 Chicago is right there near the top. IF they are among the least biased news sources out there, we are truly doomed.An admittedly cursory DuckDuckGo search on "Sinclair Broadcast Group" seems to indicate that it is a media conglomerate that is accused of "right wing bias".
Also, that this echo chamber denunciation of fake news was indeed a script mandated, in March of 2018, by corporate to be read on the air by each affiliate.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sinclair-broadcast-group/
My point? Both sides have their biased outlets, and one should always have a supply of salt grains when consuming their respective products. Assuming, of course, that one can trust the source of these allegations.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
That we celebrate Cocaine Mitch running judges through is a prime example. That should be expected work, not above and beyond...
Since I don't post here much, this may may be hard to believe, but on most topics, I consider myself to be to the political right of most people around here.
As such, I believe my stances to be correct and, dare I say, morally superior to those of the liberal left. So, when I see things like this scripted message coming from "my" side, it pisses me off because a) I want to think that "we" are above such nonsense 2) this and the wacko (imo) conspiracy sites water down "our" message and D) I used to believe much of the breathless stories about evidence which will send Clinton to prison, or iron-clad proof of voter fraud which will result in Trump being victorious. And invariably, true though they might be, the stories end up being less than farts in the wind.
I really, really wish that these stories were true, that justice would always prevail, and that good always triumphs over evil. But in real life, it seems that justice and good rarely win, and the petulant 5 year-old that still lives in me still wants to stamp his foot and scream, "No fair!"
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me a thousand times, shame on me.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Yeah, I think that I should work on changing my screen name to "Pollyanna".Well, IMO, right there's your problem