FBI raids Trumps home

[BugI02]

Something that is different from the other notification chimes. An ominous tone if you will. Or the intro to Another one bites the dust.

A couple bars of the Darth Vader theme music would do the trick

 

[BugI02]

The requirements to be President are irrelevant. The question of the day is whether or not the laws cited above apply to the President

Seems to me SCOTUS would be the final arbiter of that question, and that the Constitution would (should) be their guide

 

[Chewie]

Something that is different from the other notification chimes. An ominous tone if you will. Or the intro to Another one bites the dust.

And I was just going to make a comment about him becoming a Kut Jr. or a jeephammer jr.. As usual I am a few hours late.

I kind of like "Another One Bites the Dust" as the shooter notification chime!

 

[bwframe]

Marjorie Taylor Greene files articles of impeachment against Garland

Republicans, including Greene, have repeatedly accused the Justice Department of going after Trump for political reasons.

thehill.com

 

[foszoe]

Do Presidents retain any security clearances after leaving office?

 

[KG1]

Do Presidents retain any security clearances after leaving office?

I think as tradition ex-presidents were given access to classified intelligence briefings, but a current administration could revoke that access at any time.

 

[tim87tr]

4.5 min video discussing the unifying impact of the Raid and how something so bad can be used for good.

Brian Kennedy Gives His Assessment Of Trump Raid And How It Has United Republicans

Brian Kennedy Gives His Assessment Of Trump Raid And How It Has United Republicans

rumble.com

 

[actaeon277]

Wow. Shootered already

We should be able to get shooter alerts on our phones or something

Problem is, you'd get notified of all the side conversations.. upside down cake.. pizza.. pineapple.. etc.

 

[04FXSTS]

Do Presidents retain any security clearances after leaving office?

I don't remember who it was but it was some sleazy democrat official that lost his job right after Trump became President had a fit because he was loosing his clearances. Seems like the democrats defended it as a common practice to keep clearances even after leaving a position. Jim.

 

[BigRed]

Do Presidents retain any security clearances after leaving office?

Well, I doubt obammy could have passed a security clearance before he occupied the executive position. Once the position is occupied, tails on clearance follow to some extent.

Hell, obammy is running his third term right now.

 

[KellyinAvon]

More fallout from the Monday "don't call it a raid" and the Friday afternoon document dump:

FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources​

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an independent, special master to review the records.

Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by attorney-client privilege.

The FBI seized classified records from Trump's Palm Beach home during its unprecedented Monday morning raid, including some marked as top secret. But the former president is disputing the classification, saying the records have been declassified.

FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized records covered by attorney-client privilege during its raid of Mar-a-Lago, sources told Fox News, saying the DOJ denied Trump requests for a special master to review those records.

www.foxnews.com

 

[SheepDog4Life]

...

If it comes to it, the Supreme Court will decide. THAT is certainly in the Constitution.

Yes, if it comes to it, the Supreme Court will determine if the legislation in question can limit/eliminate a presidential candidacy that otherwise meets the requirements set forth in the Constitution.

But, no, the power of the SCOTUS to determine whether legislation or Presidential acts are constitutional or not, is NOT in the Constitution. It was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison.

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

About the Supreme Court

Supreme Court Background Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish."...

www.uscourts.gov

 

[phylodog]

More fallout from the Monday "don't call it a raid" and the Friday afternoon document dump:

FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources​

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an independent, special master to review the records.

Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by attorney-client privilege.

The FBI seized classified records from Trump's Palm Beach home during its unprecedented Monday morning raid, including some marked as top secret. But the former president is disputing the classification, saying the records have been declassified.

FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized records covered by attorney-client privilege during its raid of Mar-a-Lago, sources told Fox News, saying the DOJ denied Trump requests for a special master to review those records.

www.foxnews.com

Color me shocked that our beloved and oh so rich with integrity FBI would knowingly seize documents they shouldn’t have. The next step will be finding another Epstein judge to further ignore the rule of law so they can continue the illegal witch hunt, use privileged information and spin half truths with it to piece together an “investigation” which will drag out as long as they can make it and result in the same ”success” that the ******** Russia Hoax and basically every other thing they’ve tried to do to the guy.

If Trump announces and they can’t make something stick they’ll assassinate him before they allow him to hold that office again.

 

[MCgrease08]

 

[MCgrease08]

I haven't seen much discussion around the fact that the warrant gave the FBI a window of up to two weeks to conduct the raid.

One would think that alone undercuts the argument that this was truly a national security issue. If The documents posed such a threat to national security, the raid would have been carried out immediately.

The affidavit allegedly asserting probable cause has not been made available to the public by the DOJ or the federal court that sealed it. The search warrant was signed on Aug. 5 and gave authorities two weeks to conduct the unprecedented raid. The federal magistrate who signed the warrant previously donated thousands to former President Barack Obama.

BREAKING: FBI Demanded Any Record Trump Saw As POTUS

The FBI search warrant obtained by The Federalist authorizes confiscation of every record Trump ever saw as president.

thefederalist.com

 

[KG1]

I haven't seen much discussion around the fact that the warrant gave the FBI a window of up to two weeks to conduct the raid.

One would think that alone undercuts the argument that this was truly a national security issue. If The documents posed such a threat to national security, the raid would have been carried out immediately.

BREAKING: FBI Demanded Any Record Trump Saw As POTUS

The FBI search warrant obtained by The Federalist authorizes confiscation of every record Trump ever saw as president.

thefederalist.com

I've seen this mentioned. I believe the judge was also publicly critical of Trump in the past.

 

[KG1]

More fallout from the Monday "don't call it a raid" and the Friday afternoon document dump:

FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources​

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an independent, special master to review the records.

Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by attorney-client privilege.

The FBI seized classified records from Trump's Palm Beach home during its unprecedented Monday morning raid, including some marked as top secret. But the former president is disputing the classification, saying the records have been declassified.

FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized records covered by attorney-client privilege during its raid of Mar-a-Lago, sources told Fox News, saying the DOJ denied Trump requests for a special master to review those records.

www.foxnews.com

I think it was mentioned by Andy McCarthy that this was pretty much akin to a general warrant so they could go in and grab anything they wanted. Like I said previously. this wasn't just about retrieving "classified" documents. They used it as a pretext to do a fishing expedition to try and get the goods on Trump, most likely some evidence for the J6 clown show investigation. and the judge signed off on it.

It was clearly a violation of the 4th Amendment.

 

[qwerty]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

 

[jwamplerusa]

this was pretty akin to a general warrant so they could go in and grab anything they wanted.

This seems relevant "...The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Oh, and to further inform the discussion. "
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added:..."

Ponder that as the narrative of the raid unfolds.

 

[KG1]

CITIZEN FREE PRESS

The Greatest News Site On The Internet. Home of CFP Nation.

citizenfreepress.com

Who knows but I will say this. It wouldn't surprise me if it were true. At this point they will stop at nothing to try and take Trump down.