I like the way you think. I'm in!Uh.. shouldn't Guy be buying the drinks and dinner? I mean, the damages are just to make the victim whole. Its the attorneys who profit!
Actually, I'd like to buy TF a dinner. He fought the fight when a lot of people would just shrug, and say, "It's too much trouble"
Agreed ! Actually, I made that offer over a year ago, It still stands dude! You and your lovely + the most phenomenal steaks in the Tri-State area.
IBFFOGP
In before free food offer gets pulled
Uh.. shouldn't Guy be buying the drinks and dinner? I mean, the damages are just to make the victim whole. Its the attorneys who profit!
Awesome.
Next steps? The city will probably seek review by the Indiana Supreme Court. That process is known as seeking "transfer." In this kind of case, the ISC does not have to review it. Generally, civil cases have a low percentage of transfers. This, however, is a unique case, so it is hard to tell whether they will take it or not.
It'll take roughly 60 days for the parties to request/respond to transfer. After that, it will be up to the ISC to decide whether to take it, which could take weeks or months.
ETA:
Solid, solid win. Decent analysis by Baker, too, although I'm a bit surprised May and Barteau didn't offer any dissent or concurrence in result. After reading it, I actually doubt ISC will take transfer. Would rather see how it plays out.
Well of course he did. He's not paying for it!!
If Evansville is anything like Hammond, the mayors' buddies were contracted to defend the city.Since prosecutors ar normally judged by their success in winning cases, he will need to plea out many cases to bury this one.
If Evansville is anything like Hammond, the mayors' buddies were contracted to defend the city.
T.F..... Who is the prosecutor? If you can say. I'd like to spread the word to all my working buddies before the next election.