A reason to carry at the zoo. 2 yrs. old dead cause guardians have no brain.
Linky
Stupid people at zoos are not the ones with firearms. Prayers for the family, as foolish as they may be.
From the article
Walmart gets squashed like a stepped-on ant, while one brave gentleman fights for gun rights for us all. I hope Mr. Magenheimer wins!
I was playing email tag with WalMart's attorney and the City Council VP that was strong-arming WalMart back when this all shook down. There is a thread about it in the General forum. (too lazy to find the link LOL)
I tried to create a ruckus and WalMart still wasn't interested.
I think I'm adversely affected by the policies that SB foisted upon WM. I don't think it matters that WM complied willingly, because of the council's edicts, I can't go to SB Wally World and buy a "tactical" firearm.
Hey, Guy, wanna go to South Bend?
Did you contact Guy and ask him about it?But the city can't put out any ordinances or "agreements" that say that WM can or can't sell certain firearms. By doing so, they're limiting where I can buy those firearms that they don't want sold. That adversely affects me as a consumer.
WM has chosen not to be injured by the council's edict. That doesn't mean that I'm not.
But the city can't put out any ordinances or "agreements" that say that WM can or can't sell certain firearms. By doing so, they're limiting where I can buy those firearms that they don't want sold. That adversely affects me as a consumer.
WM has chosen not to be injured by the council's edict. That doesn't mean that I'm not.
Shouldn't this have been...You mean he knows you?
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Much Fail with this post...We was probably removed for failing to secure the weapon. Any facility has the right to limit possession of weapons on their property. No diiferent than a homeowner limiting a person from carrying a weapon in their home. It's a right to carry unless posted. And then it's not a weapons charge, it's usually an overbearing individual that ends up arrested for disorderly conduct. My question would be how they knew he was carrying?
We was probably removed for failing to secure the weapon. Any facility has the right to limit possession of weapons on their property. No diiferent than a homeowner limiting a person from carrying a weapon in their home. It's a right to carry unless posted. And then it's not a weapons charge, it's usually an overbearing individual that ends up arrested for disorderly conduct. My question would be how they knew he was carrying?
We was probably removed for failing to secure the weapon. Any facility has the right to limit possession of weapons on their property. No diiferent than a homeowner limiting a person from carrying a weapon in their home. It's a right to carry unless posted. And then it's not a weapons charge, it's usually an overbearing individual that ends up arrested for disorderly conduct. My question would be how they knew he was carrying?