Trust me.... you can have them... Thats why I live in the county..
You can keep them. Lol, I can't wait for Frosty's court date. Hopefully, I can be there.
Trust me.... you can have them... Thats why I live in the county..
We have many converted pole barns here in Spencer Co. It seems to be very popular in this area. Good thing is a pole barn usually means good area around it, which translates into a home shooting range.I've lived in Evansville all my life....never been a big fan of the cops. Many have such an attitude. Currently myself, Wife and in laws are working on converting a pole barn in rural Spencer County into a house (were still at the interior framing stage now). In about 3 years or so we won't live in Evansville anymore!
HARD TARGET Firearms Training; a name that has special meaning to this company and to you the customer. A hard target is a difficult target, a target that is impervious to hostile fire.
You can keep them. Lol, I can't wait for Frosty's court date. Hopefully, I can be there.
BTW...when is it? It would be worth the trip just to hear Guy's rhetoric.
Seriously....If possible, I'd make the drive!
The liberals slandering with political bs...not surprised one bit. I can attest and vouch for TF, he's not the "time bomb" those paranoid freaks(liberals) think he is.
Media, only good for pushing their agenda
But doesn't the reporting of OTHERS opinions constitute a factual reporting of the story?
As long as the paper isn't putting out THEIR opinions in a supposedly factual report (which I didn't see here) I see no problem with reporting others opinions - as long as they are not implied as anything otherwise.
So, If they collected evidence that he was OCing to 'make a point' , did they just prove that the act of OCing is a form of political speech?
If the Gun is legal & the law says he can carry it, it is the same as people doing "sit ins" and other acts that are forms of speech..
But doesn't the reporting of OTHERS opinions constitute a factual reporting of the story?
As long as the paper isn't putting out THEIR opinions in a supposedly factual report (which I didn't see here) I see no problem with reporting others opinions - as long as they are not implied as anything otherwise.
So, If they collected evidence that he was OCing to 'make a point' , did they just prove that the act of OCing is a form of political speech?
If the Gun is legal & the law says he can carry it, it is the same as people doing "sit ins" and other acts that are forms of speech..
Today's Courier and Press has an editorial about the suit. You can go to www.courierpress.com and read it.