smoking357
Shooter
Again, his enjoyment of the book is irrelevant to whether he has it or not. Are you now claiming his enjoyment is property as well?
You're being paternalistic and presumptuous. Where do you have the authority to know or decree how he does or should enjoy his book.
What worth is property if not for the benefits it confers? Did Papa John buy back his Camaro because he merely needed a car? Does he smile when he drives it? Why are there different types of cars made? I reject your attempt to divorce property from its benefits.