Coronovirus IV

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    31,545
    113
    North Central

    Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    9,365
    113
    Texas
    Screen-Shot-2020-09-08-at-10.48.47-PM.png
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    31,545
    113
    North Central
    The response to the Covid-19 pandemic by the scientists appears to have been a big blunder, though it is unlikely they will ever admit it. Nor will the politicians duped admit it, and neither will the people they duped, nope, they will just pretend all is good.

    These figures were used on the computer model that predicted 10 times the actual death rate. Used by governments around the world.

    First, there’s the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This is the total number of people who are infected by a disease and the number of them who die. This figure includes those who have no symptoms at all, or only very mild symptoms – those who stayed at home, coughed a bit and watched Outbreak.


    Then there’s the Case Fatality Rate (CFR). This is the number of people suffering serious symptoms, who are probably ill enough to be in hospital. Clearly, people who are seriously ill – the “cases” – are going to have a higher mortality rate than those who are infected, many of whom don’t have symptoms. Put simply – all cases are infections, but not all infections are cases.

    Which means that the CFR will always be far higher than the IFR. With influenza, the CFR is around ten times as high as the IFR. Covid seems to have a similar proportion.


    Now, clearly, you do not want to get these figures mixed up. By doing so you would either wildly overestimate, or wildly underestimate, the impact of Covid. But mix these figures up, they did.

    So, they matched up the one percent CFR of Covid with the incorrect 0.1 percent CFR of flu. Suddenly, Covid was going to be ten times as deadly.



    https://www.rt.com/op-ed/500000-cov...M1OEDIerWs9J0GdyQN9dzWb8JVUgs5AAKJ4xNKVeeWGwE

    https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/04/covid-why-terminology-really-matters/
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,355
    113
    Gtown-ish

    Well. Sure. It's newsworthy. Makes sense that swarms of people gathering in close proximity during a pandemic would obviously increase the spread. The expected thing actually happened. That's newsworthy. But apparently it's only newsworthy when it's bikers gathering. I'd kinda like media to be consistent about it. If news agencies eagerly report biker gatherings contributing to the case count, it's reasonable to hope they'd be as eager to report all gatherings contributing to the case count, including the gatherings they support. It's a cause. Instead they publish nonsense "studies" that show counter-intuitive bull****, like protests actually stop the spread. It's poopy when they do it. It's okay when we do it. Meh. **** them.
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,665
    149
    Earth
    Watch: Lifeguard Arrested, Led Away in Handcuffs by Hazmat Cops for ‘Surfing with Coronavirus’

    This is insanity.

    Remarkable footage has revealed the moment police officers — dressed head-to-toe in hazmat suits — frogmarched a young woman up a beach in handcuffs after she went surfing after being diagnosed with coronavirus.

    A professional lifeguard was reported to police by her own colleagues in San Sebastian, in the Bay of Biscay in Spain’s Basque country on Monday after she was spotted surfing while placed on medical leave by her employer following a positive coronavirus test.

    The woman was arrested for “serious disobedience and crimes against public health”.

    Ironically, the arrest came just days after it was reported Spanish hospitals had started taking coronavirus patients to the beach for their health and wellbeing.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Well, 290 actual contact traced cases... 260,000 "estimated" from "trends" in the areas the attendees came from, lol!

    Let's just say I question the accuracy of those estimates. :rolleyes:

    Don't the attendees come from all over? So wouldn't the 'trends' in the areas they come from just be the trend in the US? But according to worldometers, the 7 day trend line of new cases was at just 38101 per day for 8 Sept and dropping - and that is for 331,000,000 people

    Seems a bit of a stretch
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH

    It makes a twisted sort of sense when you remember it isn't about whether the stricture and its enforcement makes sense, it is that the people need to be conditioned to obey the government without question. Remember the California cops deploying 5 officers total, three ashore and two in a boat, to roust a lone paddle boarder enjoying the ocean off of a (state mandated) deserted beach
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,665
    149
    Earth
    It makes a twisted sort of sense when you remember it isn't about whether the stricture and its enforcement makes sense, it is that the people need to be conditioned to obey the government without question. Remember the California cops deploying 5 officers total, three ashore and two in a boat, to roust a lone paddle boarder enjoying the ocean off of a (state mandated) deserted beach

    Yep. I completely agree. At the time of the paddle boarding incident I said this. (Pulled from the "to mask or not to mask" thread.)

    I think it goes even deeper than that. IMHO, it's not just about compelling others to make the same choice that they would, it's about erasing the idea that there is even a choice to be made. The paddle board example is a good one to make this point.

    First, zero tolerance policies like this eliminate critical thinking from the equation by making violations black and white. The beach is closed, that guy is in the ocean. He is in violation. Those with totalitarian tendencies must eliminate critical thinking through social conditioning n order to control others who may question the edicts.

    Second, the average person sees a man paddle boarding alone and thinks, "there's no risk to that. He's not harming anyone. That action seems perfectly reasonable." Again, this undermines the edicts of totalitarian-minded people. They cannot risk the rest of the public seeing that making a choice is even an option. If the man paddle boarding in the ocean is not made an example of, then others might be inspired to make their own choice. Totalitarians can't allow that.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,355
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Yeah. It's conditioning, but more as a function of their experiences as opposed to someone else's. I talk to people at work about it, and most think that people should wear masks. And of the people who think that people should wear masks, most of those think they should be mandated. And then some of those think it should be a crime not to wear one. Those who want penalties seem to be the people who believe that you're imposing your germs on them when you're not wearing a mask.

    Listen to what they say. These people literally think you're putting them in danger by not wearing masks. They're just conditioned by living in their own bubble and see mask wearing as a necessary part of life. Add that to the new sort of Millennial ethos of conformity and some people get pretty bat **** crazy about wearing masks. So rather than thinking that there's a covert group trying to manipulate the masses, maybe it's more that people react to things according to how their DNA meshes with their life experience. Maybe if you live in an uber-densely populated area, you'll grow up with the sensibilities of people who are crammed together into large metro areas. Maybe growing up, DNA, family life, school, life experiences, condition you to process information differently than people who grew up in flyover country. It's not that stricter enforcement makes any kind of universal sense. It's that it makes most sense to those people and it makes less sense to people like you.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,190
    149
    Valparaiso
    How different is it from a guy getting a ticket for doing 110 mph on a desert highway where no one else is around? It's asinine, sure...but not new. There's a rule and no matter if the person "breaking" the rule is actually exposing someone to harm, they're going to enforce it.

    While this is a prime example of wasteful enforcement, how many places are there with mask mandates and how much actual official enforcement goes on? Not much that I can see.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,190
    149
    Valparaiso
    Don't the attendees come from all over? So wouldn't the 'trends' in the areas they come from just be the trend in the US? But according to worldometers, the 7 day trend line of new cases was at just 38101 per day for 8 Sept and dropping - and that is for 331,000,000 people

    Seems a bit of a stretch

    If some legitimate group were interested in doing a scientifically valid study, there is NO WAY they could have reached any conclusions 3 weeks after the rally. That's not how that works.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,355
    113
    Gtown-ish
    How different is it from a guy getting a ticket for doing 110 mph on a desert highway where no one else is around? It's asinine, sure...but not new. There's a rule and no matter if the person "breaking" the rule is actually exposing someone to harm, they're going to enforce it.

    While this is a prime example of wasteful enforcement, how many places are there with mask mandates and how much actual official enforcement goes on? Not much that I can see.

    Ridiculous enforcement doesn't happen much therefore it's not worth talking about? Caring about? *****ing about? What? There's a point here. I'm just trying to know what it is exactly.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,190
    149
    Valparaiso
    Ridiculous enforcement doesn't happen much therefore it's not worth talking about? Caring about? *****ing about? What? There's a point here. I'm just trying to know what it is exactly.

    The point?

    It's not new and if it is part of a grand design to change society or whatever, it started around the time of the Code of Hammurabi or before. We should be as concerned about ridiculous enforcement today as we were in 2019, no more, no less. The times we are living in are not as "unprecedented" as we have been led to believe.
     

    SheepDog4Life

    Natural Gray Man
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    May 14, 2016
    5,383
    113
    Upstate SC
    Don't the attendees come from all over? So wouldn't the 'trends' in the areas they come from just be the trend in the US? But according to worldometers, the 7 day trend line of new cases was at just 38101 per day for 8 Sept and dropping - and that is for 331,000,000 people

    Seems a bit of a stretch

    That's putting it mildly... not to mention the Sturgis attendees would have been returning home right about the time school was starting in many areas... how they would separate any "Sturgis" trend from a "back to school" trend is beyond me.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,355
    113
    Gtown-ish
    The point?

    It's not new and if it is part of a grand design to change society or whatever, it started around the time of the Code of Hammurabi or before. We should be as concerned about ridiculous enforcement today as we were in 2019, no more, no less. The times we are living in are not as "unprecedented" as we have been led to believe.

    Okay. if "It's" refers to covid, I pretty much agree with that. I don't think there's a grand design in a conspiratorial sense WRT COVID-19. Like I'm not gonna start calling it the bank bug anytime soon. That it's being politicized in an election year should not surprise anyone. I think it's more like I said, people are conditioned by nature and nurture to process things differently. It's just a difference in processing and reaction. And it kinda looks like it's a bit generational, though not without exceptions. Some people think that people who don't wear masks are stupid and should be punished by society. Some people think wearing masks is stupid. And of course there are opinions all through the spectrum. That's not a conspiracy. It's not part of a grand design to change society. It's just people processing something they don't fully understand and reacting to it.

    That's separate from "woke" social justice. That's not so much a conspiracy as a movement that started in academia and has spilled over into society and is trying to become mainstream. It's similar to what happened in the 60s. Thankfully there weren't enough of them. And soon we all forgot about the far left hippies, their terrorist organizations, bombings and such. They were indeed implementing a grand design to change society. And it's fair to say there was a "them" and there still is a "them". Robin DiAngelo, for example is a them. They ARE trying to change society. They're overt enough about that in their own literature. Critical theory is all about flipping the power hierarchy. Take power away from oppressive identity group--there's only one, and give that power to the oppressed identity groups, there are many. Normal people don't think in terms of every interaction being solely about power and oppression. That's derived ideologically. Most people aren't trying to oppress people, and in the West, and especially in the US, most people aren't oppressed. "Woke" IS an existential threat to normal people and should not be dismissed.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom