I'm not sure I understand this part. You mostly agree with what I said and yet you disagree that I have an opinion? Are you arguing against my stance on the immorality of homosexuality and it's intrusion into society?
Sodomy is a violation of the UCMJ.....
Gay, straight or otherwise....
Sodomy is a violation of the UCMJ.....
Gay, straight or otherwise....
Hmmm, eleven years? Did you take a short to re-up?
Technically, the only authorized sex position is the missionary and between husbands and wifes at least according to the ucmj
I'm not sure I understand this part. You mostly agree with what I said and yet you disagree that I have an opinion? Are you arguing against my stance on the immorality of homosexuality and it's intrusion into society?
It's my opinion and to me it IS absolutism.
The strength of our military is defined by conforming to regulations, not by doing your own thing. 250 years of the 'no gays' policy is suddenly wrong because why?
The anal sex provision is in the usmj inorder to limit the spread of HIV or so our jag officer told us. Technically, the only authorized sex position is the missionary and between husbands and wifes at least according to the ucmj
Good Lord, how boring.
You constructed your position in such a way that anyone who disagrees with you "is the problem" and you implied someone who disagrees doesn't care about the lives of Americans.
I care about the lives of Americans, and I disagree with you. You are disproven.
The anal sex provision is in the usmj inorder to limit the spread of HIV or so our jag officer told us. Technically, the only authorized sex position is the missionary and between husbands and wifes at least according to the ucmj
Though you exaggerate about authorized positions, you make a good point.
Any service member who has engaged in oral sex with his wife has violated the UCMJ, whereas a gay man who admits he's gay is discharged administratively because of a policy that is not codified in the UCMJ.
That makes the gay man administratively discharged a better soldier than you closet criminals who just haven't been caught and prosecuted.
You can go to jail for having oral sex with your wife, you just get discharged for being openly gay.
Though you exaggerate about authorized positions, you make a good point.
Any service member who has engaged in oral sex with his wife has violated the UCMJ, whereas a gay man who admits he's gay is discharged administratively because of a policy that is not codified in the UCMJ.
That makes the gay man administratively discharged a better soldier than you closet criminals who just haven't been caught and prosecuted.
You can go to jail for having oral sex with your wife, you just get discharged for being openly gay.
I certainly did. Because, in my opinion, people that want to experiment with soldiers lives are the problem.
Although you may say you care about them and yet you are willing to experiment. You do not know the outcome of allowing them to serve openly. Were I still serving I wouldn't appreciate, no, I would be angry that you, and people with your opinion, would want me to try it out to see if it works.
Hoosier8... owning a Corvette isn't necessarily or potentially a mental condition. Gays have been serving but haven't been serving openly. I'm saying that openly serving will create problems, potentially huge problems.
Okay, here we go.
All of this was gained from copies of the standard Army sexual briefing slide show. According to the slide show, all information is from the UCMJ MANUAL FOR COURTS MARTIAL.
920.ART.120. Subsection A) Any person subject to the UCMJ who commits an act of sexual intercourse with a female not his wife or male not her husband, regardless of marital status shall be punished as a court-martial directs.
925.ART.125 subsection A) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation or acts of none vaginal intercourse with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight is sufficient to complete the offense.
Subsection B) any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial directs.
Article 120 para 45(b(13). The UCMJ defines sodomy as any sexual act other than vaginal intercouse from a natural position. A natural position is defined as the "missionary" position or the male on top of the female during vaginal intercourse.