In the event joe runs and loses, kamala is on a ballistic trajectory to obscurity. I don't think she will even find a place in newsom's california. Probably kick around dc for a while or get a spot on the view.
Should could do recorded laugh tracks for talk shows...
Depends, if Harris gets the nomination then no problem. If not from my understanding it can be transferred, but not to a candidate. It could go to the DNC or a super PAC who can spend it in support of whoever gets the nod. But they are not "allowed" to collaborate with a candidate about the spending. At least that is my understanding of it.I said no for a few reasons.
The money, bidet has collected a lot if it and it is bound by federal election commission laws and rules as to its uses. It cannot just be handed out. Estimated at near $100,000,000
That I can't speak to, I have enough problems keeping up with IN and a bit fed code.The legal, states have laws as to exactly how candidates get on the general ballot, and calling up the county election offices and saying switch name ain’t one of them. If the switch occurs there will be lawsuits in dozens of states over who and how the ballots are made.
Eh, depends on the person. Newsome has at least OK name recognition. Whitmer not as much. At least in my non scientific opinion. As far as getting a team put together. I'm gonna guess that any of the even moderately serious contenders have had it waiting in the wings for at least a year, maybe more.The disaster, would any of you want your first big chance to win the Indy 500 in a wrecked car two laps down if you were really a serious talent with a chance to win? Running for president takes a multi years effort to build a team, donors, name recognition, and support. We political junkies may know the players but the normies/sheeple don’t.
Honestly I think they seriously overestimated her in 2020. And once she got tapped for VP it was too late. Getting rid of a "POC" woman? Yeah right. Only if they had a lesbian, trans, handicapped (yes Harris would fit that as well), furry to run.The one thing I am surprised about is that they didn't have a better succession plan than Harris (even as early as last election let alone letting it get to this). I would have thought they (dems that are running the show) would have put a "better" VP in place, because they had to know that Joe wasn't going to be able to make it to or through a second term (whether one believes they intended to take him out of the picture the whole time, or his age/mental capacity, etc would just catch up with him).
That name can be exchanged. Its just a matter of who sticks it to who first and hardest.
This just seems to minimize what it takes to mount a serious campaign. I am sure they know who their consigliere will be but a campaign needs an operation in most of 50 states. As it is any new candidate will be stuck with the bidet team to work the individual states. They do not have a 50 state team at the ready…Eh, depends on the person. Newsome has at least OK name recognition. Whitmer not as much. At least in my non scientific opinion. As far as getting a team put together. I'm gonna guess that any of the even moderately serious contenders have had it waiting in the wings for at least a year, maybe more.
I don't get it.So I think this is another indicator that what will be, is most definitely burdened by what has been.