Whatever happened to banging your secretary, then firing her when it got messy?
Whatever happened to banging your secretary, then firing her when it got messy?
Lawsuits
Ask Richard Gere had Crawford, yet...the gerbil......allegedly.
This thread is scary. A lot of people blaming the tool and victims instead of the perpetrators.
The moral implications of using the tool or running the tool shouldn't be considered.
This thread is scary. A lot of people blaming the tool and victims instead of the perpetrators.
The moral implications of using the tool or running the tool shouldn't be considered.
This thread is scary. A lot of people blaming the tool and victims instead of the perpetrators.
The moral implications of using the tool or running the tool shouldn't be considered.
Well said but I believe you're skirting the line here. Last I checked, being an adulterer wasn't illegal, only frowned upon by those of us who set our moral standards a bit higher. I see this case being closer to the over 21 college student being raped because he or she had a drink or two and someone didn't accept no for an answer. It seemed like there were a lot of posts that were ok with the identity/financial info being stolen because the victim used a service that the poster didn't agree with.I disagree. I don't think INGOers are blaming the site for getting hacked. Rather, it is hard to justify sympathizing with people who were acting (or trying to act) immorally in the first place.
To address your formulation, if a gun-toting criminal gets shot, I don't sympathize with him very much, even though we shared an interest in firearms. But, I also don't blame the gun.
Well said but I believe you're skirting the line here. Last I checked, being an adulterer wasn't illegal, only frowned upon by those of us who set our moral standards a bit higher. I see this case being closer to the over 21 college student being raped because he or she had a drink or two and someone didn't accept no for an answer. It seemed like there were a lot of posts that were ok with the identity/financial info being stolen because the victim used a service that the poster didn't agree with.
I didn't say that, you did. You should compare the whole statement instead of part of the statement. The criminal acts are not to be compared individually. The reactions that people have to the situations should be compared. In one people are indifferent because they don't agree with what the victim was doing. In the other people are outraged as you just proved. Are we to be more outraged because the criminal act is more egregious? I would think our reactions should be that neither is acceptable.So having your info hacked and devious deeds exposed to the world is tantamount to rape in your book? And you find the rest of the reactions in this thread scary? Holy **** man.
Neither hacking or rape? Neither trolling for adultery or dressing scantily? You need to be more specific, your post lends itself to a half dozen different readings. I don't know which one,other,neither,criminal act,victim, you are referring to in any given sentence.I didn't say that, you did. You should compare the whole statement instead of part of the statement. The criminal acts are not to be compared individually. The reactions that people have to the situations should be compared. In one people are indifferent because they don't agree with what the victim was doing. In the other people are outraged as you just proved. Are we to be more outraged because the criminal act is more egregious? I would think our reactions should be that neither is acceptable.
I didn't say that, you did. You should compare the whole statement instead of part of the statement. The criminal acts are not to be compared individually. The reactions that people have to the situations should be compared. In one people are indifferent because they don't agree with what the victim was doing. In the other people are outraged as you just proved. Are we to be more outraged because the criminal act is more egregious? I would think our reactions should be that neither is acceptable.
Well said but I believe you're skirting the line here. Last I checked, being an adulterer wasn't illegal, only frowned upon by those of us who set our moral standards a bit higher. I see this case being closer to the over 21 college student being raped because he or she had a drink or two and someone didn't accept no for an answer. It seemed like there were a lot of posts that were ok with the identity/financial info being stolen because the victim used a service that the poster didn't agree with.