Let's take it to PM since we are skirting the edge of acceptability with this line of discussion, but you made the claim so you back it up. Provide the examples where the acts of Jesus are clearly condoning/enabling the sinful behavior of the people with whom he interacts. And for the sake of being on the same page: talking to them and interacting with them is not condoning or enabling. One does not need to participate, condone, or enable sinful behavior to forgive as God has forgiven. I cannot fathom how you can argue that Jesus would participate in sin, even by proxy.
Sidebar: Jesus didn't wash the feet of a prostitute. The "sinful woman" washed/annointed the feet of Jesus, knowing who He was. Given the story is recounted with a Pharisee present and given the definition of "sinful" to the Pharisees, to say that the woman is a prostitute is conjecture at best. Her specific sin is not named.
I support the right of businesses to serve at their discretion. But you are incorrect that this law is the right thing to do. This law is in direct response to a court ruling that vacated that right without cause. The original victim in this whole debacle is not the gay couple who were denied the services of a particular baker because said baker objected to the subject/purpose of the cake. The victim is the business that is being compelled by force to operate in contradiction to its best interests. Any law mandates that is wrong. Not right.
