America in the Midst of a Coup d'Etat

[Hotdoger]

when I first read that I thought, MJ really doesn't seem like a DU kind of guy.... It hit me then, you're not talking about my kind of DU

Some people post WILD thoughts and this is a gun forum, so I can see the connections.

 

[El-Cigarro]

No wonder he's still losing all his sponsors, it's the same show he's been shilling for years.

Read where he just signed a new CONTRACT for 400 Mill......

 

[Hotdoger]

Read where he just signed a new CONTRACT for 400 Mill......

He is a fat drug addict with no sponsors, how could they resign him for that much?

 

[Expat]

Rush is still the most listened to, radio show in America. So I am sure the sponsors are taking their money to Maddow or Ed or whoever it is on the radio that MJ is listening too...

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

I assume you will go to Barry then when you need some marijuana or cocaine.

Nope, i heard Bush has better.

 

[patience0830]

Nope, i heard Bush has better.

Yeah. Better sense these days.

I bet we don't drug test Presidents. We don't drug test welfare recipients, why drug test the POTUS?

Barrys prolly high right now.

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

Yeah. Better sense these days.

I would hope so, I hear cocaine isnt a good choice to extend your life when your holed up in a hospital for a month with some ailment

 

[Trooper]

The common complaint among leftwingers is that not only is the constitution out of date, it is racists and favors the rich. Thus it needs to be replaced. Life needs to be fair, and equal. Of course if life is fair and equal then we are all equally poor and enslaved. But for many leftwingers, their hatred of the rest of us is so great that they would destroy the country, destroy Western Culture as well, just to get even.

 

[netsecurity]

Lush is still going on about a coup? Sheesh. He's been saying that since, what? 2009? This is the slowest coup in the history of coups. And I hate to break it to fatboy, but Obama already runs the executive branch and that's pretty much the entirety of the government machine. No wonder he's still losing all his sponsors, it's the same show he's been shilling for years. Obama's a turd, for sure, but this is just a passing phase in the nation. He'll be gone when his term's up and another ****head will take his place.

So predictable [sigh]. Every time the name Rush Limbaugh comes up certain people respond by attacking his character, calling him names, and never even discussing or reading the article. This is a discussion forum, so why can't we discuss topics instead of playing liberal Obama politics 101? Yes, he is an entertainer, but he is also a respected conservative intellectual who spends most of the hours each day analyzing the state of American politics, so it is outright ignorant to dismiss him.

 

[Trooper]

So predictable [sigh]. Every time the name Rush Limbaugh comes up certain people respond by attacking his character, calling him names, and never even discussing or reading the article. This is a discussion forum, so why can't we discuss topics instead of playing liberal Obama politics 101? Yes, he is an entertainer, but he is also a respected conservative intellectual who spends most of the hours each day analyzing the state of American politics, so it is outright ignorant to dismiss him.

Makes you wonder if these INGO types are truly libertarians or democrat plants.

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

Makes you wonder if these INGO types are truly libertarians or democrat plants.

yeah, because not trusting the word of a known liar and shock jock makes a Libertarian a Democrat plant.

 

[Expat]

Makes you wonder if these INGO types are truly libertarians or democrat plants.

I stopped wondering years ago. They always deflect any criticism of the Democrats and constantly attack any Republican.

 

[LEaSH]

Who does that?

 

[ghunter]

Say what you like about Rush, but when talking about the article, where is he wrong? I think he boiled the issue down in fine style.

 

[Expat]

Say what you like about Rush, but when talking about the article, where is he wrong? I think he boiled the issue down in fine style.

If you can't attack the message, you attack the messenger... typical deflection.

 

[ghunter]

If you can't attack the message, you attack the messenger... typical deflection.

Yep. (Hank Hill voice, drinking beer next to the fence.)

 

[Expat]

Yep. (Hank Hill voice, drinking beer next to the fence.)

uh-huh

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

Who does that?

I hope you werent expecting an answer. Seems to be an on going thing with republicans

 

[deal me in]

I stopped wondering years ago. They always deflect any criticism of the Democrats and constantly attack any Republican.

It seems that way because you are on a gun forum that is 98% Republican/Conservative. There aren't any Dems to argue with here and we get bored with the same old "Obama sucks" articles all the time. We know Obama sucks, that's stipulated. Republicans are more likely to convert to a Libertarian viewpoint so we focus our attention on those we think might be willing to give our ideas a chance. There is no point discussing/debating with Liberals because we are so far apart. Conservatives already understand and generally agree with most of our fiscal agenda so we're halfway there.

 

[Trooper]

It seems that way because you are on a gun forum that is 98% Republican/Conservative. There aren't any Dems to argue with here and we get bored with the same old "Obama sucks" articles all the time. We know Obama sucks, that's stipulated. Republicans are more likely to convert to a Libertarian viewpoint so we focus our attention on those we think might be willing to give our ideas a chance. There is no point discussing/debating with Liberals because we are so far apart. Conservatives already understand and generally agree with most of our fiscal agenda so we're halfway there.

The problem is that it looks as if you are defending Obama and siding with the leftwing freaks.

Look at this Snowdon character. He was a big Obama supporter. now he supports Ron Paul. That gives indication that there is little difference between the Obama promises and the libertarian ones.