Bunnykid68
Grandmaster
Of course you do, you tyrantI like hasenpfeffer.
Of course you do, you tyrantI like hasenpfeffer.
What? Faith? To believe something without proof does take faith. However, you are twisting it around. We do not believe BECAUSE there is no proof, that is not faith. Someone can say that there is a teacup orbiting the Earth. Without seeing it, I would not believe it existed. Those that believe it exists without seeing it do so with faith.
Did you arrest an 11 year old kid without a warrant, without his presence, and without his mother's consent?
I so wish that we could talk about about this here but it is specifically BANNED! I have so much fun with this subject. Suffice it to say that I prefer the word agnostic or skeptic for the position you are presenting. To be an atheist, a person has to not only disbelieve but he actively DENIES the existence of god. You haven't presented proof that there IS no god, you have proven that you don't BELIEVE there is a God
Frank appeared to suggest that the existence of God was fictitious. That looks like is a denial of fact, not a statement of belief. An atheist denies the possibility that a teacup could POSSIBLY orbit the earth. They cannot give evidence as to WHY a teacup cannot orbit the earth. A belief with out evidence is faith
I understand that this is an argument about semantics. Like I said, I was just poking at the bear.
I suppose if you thought you were following old Jewish law. (Not sure why you would follow old Jewish law). But you know that even back then it was not common. Right? I mean, you understand all that, right? No? Didn't think so. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, do you? But people here have stated unequivocally that they would follow orders from their command, sergeant, or shift supervisor, including you. phylodog said it's not within his purview to determine constitutionality. Just do what you are told, just like in LA and NY and NJ and elsewhere.
Listen, we all understand that. We expect that. Just don't lie to us that you won't behave that way, because we know you will. What was the term Liberty used, Little Nazis or New Nazis or something? I should look it up.
Anyone else see the glaring OMISSION in the above post's timeline? Where, with earnestness and precision, Destro, does the arrest of the mother immediately upon demand to see the non-existent warrant fit into your "these LEOs are legally golden" narrative?They had PC to make the arrest but not to enter the house and take the kid..SO THEY DIDN'T AND WENT AND GOT A WARRANT!!!!
Recently in Florida a policeman arrested a citizen who allegedly carried a concealed handgun without a permit. The sheriff reviewed the case, dropped the charges and released the citizen. He explained that he believed in the 2d amendment and took an oath to uphold the constitution.
The Sheriff has now been relieved by the Governor and brought up on charges.
Florida Governor Has Sheriff Arrested, Removed From Office for Allowing Concealed Carry |
Sorry if this is a dupe.
I've took a guy to the psych ward after he claimed he was Jesus. There was no proof beyond his rants to support that claim. There was no reason to believe him. Could he have been Jesus? Without proof, unlikely, however, nothing is ever 100%. I could have taken Jesus to the hospital
Really?!!! Would that gambit get me out of going to jail? I could pass for Jesus, superficially at least. Well, if Jesus had gotten old and fat............. I have hair well past my shoulder blades, a full beard and Hebrew bone structure (read that as a bone eyebrow and a nose like a meat hook).
It's a darn sight easier to pretend to be sane and get out of confinement than it is to pretend to be innocent and get out.
Anyone else see the glaring OMISSION in the above post's timeline? Where, with earnestness and precision, Destro, does the arrest of the mother immediately upon demand to see the non-existent warrant fit into your "these LEOs are legally golden" narrative?