I agree. I move that 50 quality posts be required to post classes and training opportunities. Is there a 2nd?
I would agree as well.
Getting a new rule set up is not that easy.
Get a second and we will take it to committee.
I agree. I move that 50 quality posts be required to post classes and training opportunities. Is there a 2nd?
I would agree as well.
Getting a new rule set up is not that easy.
Get a second and we will take it to committee.
Gross... all this over a 1911?!?
I will second. My hesitation is/was how this might affect the top tier national instructors, some of which are members. They participate on many gun forums and not exclusively to INGO. But usually those trainers are hosted by or recommend by a local member that is active on INGO. I would have no problem for example if Bright Firearms Training advertising/hosting a class for a national trainer. Training Companies local to Indiana should be expected to participate.
It was the runner that jacked the thread.
I'm sure Coach doesn't mind that his suggestion got brought back out of the mothballs. He puts his effort, time and trouble into making this forum his home operating base for his training business. He adds lots and lots of quality content to this forum. Yet anyone can come along to post classes with their first posts with no investment what so ever.
How big of a problem is this? Maybe I am missing it, since I often don’t open threads started by people I have never heard of.
Are we saying that if someone like Marcus Luttrell joined to say he was going to appear at a local range for some instructions, that we would tell him to bugger off? I understand and can appreciate the issue, I just want the INGO to use some common sense if they address it
I'm firmly against the requirement of a certain post count to post training classes. Anything that encourages people to train should be rewarded, and I'd not like to see an additional barrier to that. If somebody is a unknown entity, question them. I haven't seen a rash of unknowns posting scam training, though. If that does happen, revisit the issue, but right now I don't see the problem.
It was the runner that jacked the thread.
I'm sure Coach doesn't mind that his suggestion got brought back out of the mothballs. He puts his effort, time and trouble into making this forum his home operating base for his training business. He adds lots and lots of quality content to this forum. Yet anyone can come along to post classes with their first posts with no investment what so ever.
Nice
Thanks even paid the $20 bucks to escape the ridicule...
Nice
I think we can tell from the growth and detached barb wire that these are not quality posts.
I personally am having troubles with the 50 post rule. since i was around and took the time to get to 50 posts but then the next day was knocked back down to my previous days number
Are you a trainer then?I personally am having troubles with the 50 post rule. since i was around and took the time to get to 50 posts but then the next day was knocked back down to my previous days number