That would be even more impressive.Didn't Bond use a .32 ACP?
That would be even more impressive.Didn't Bond use a .32 ACP?
That would be even more impressive.
Didn't Bond use a .32 ACP?
.25 lol. Now that really is worthless. I've heard countless stories of a pocket calculator and a few business cards stopping a .25. A couple my family knew were mugged and shot point blank with a .25. The woman in the face and I can't remember where he was shot, but they were both treated and released for superficial wounds.Well, a bit of research shows I was right. His PPK was a .32 ACP. What I didn't know is that he started out with a Beretta .25 prior to the iconic PPK, and the Beretta was his issued sidearm through the first 5 movies.
Well, a bit of research shows I was right. His PPK was a .32 ACP. What I didn't know is that he started out with a Beretta .25 prior to the iconic PPK, and the Beretta was his issued sidearm through the first 5 movies.
You just want to flame 'em. I think even those of us that like the .380, know it is borderline at best. The .32 has some fans, but the .25... wouldn't want to be shot by it, but don't like being punched either. I doubt you get any takers on this one.I'd like someone who likes the calibers < .380 to make a case for them. With PM380s and P238s and such on the market now, what' the point of a .25 ACP or a .32?
I'd like someone who likes the calibers < .380 to make a case for them. With PM380s and P238s and such on the market now, what' the point of a .25 ACP or a .32?
I still love my Bersa .380, easy to fire accuratly (primary need) and easy to conceal (secondary). Good shot placement fixes any power worries.
TNoutdoors9 (one of my fave YT guys) tested both RN and FN FMJ loads in .380 and they went completely through his gelatin block and into the water jugs. WAY more than 12" penetration. It would seem that there is penetration margin to give to make a JHP work in .380.