OK, I read it again. In my view this bill should be supported. It strengthens due process by adding "within 48 hours" for a hearing if there is a warrant-less (current Laird Law) confiscation. It makes the definition of "dangerous person" more specific and requires a court to determine the individual is dangerous. Greatly enhances transparency as it requires a publicly accessible report (by PD, court, county, etc.) report of all weapons confiscated. Changes "written statement" to "affidavit" for what must be submitted by LE to court.I took a look at HB 1651 Seizure of firearms from dangerous individuals. I need to read through it again, probably tomorrow. On first read this appears to provide more protection than the current "Laird Law", attempting to make something too vague more specific. It defines "dangerous person", requires an affidavit (opposed to a written statement) from LEO to the court. Adds a statement under 35-47-14: Nothing in this chapter may be construed to authorize a warrantless search or seizure by a law enforcement officer if a warrant would otherwise be required.
I need to read it again before I go thumbs up, but it could be a positive step. Can I get an INGO lawyer to give it a read?