Even if a psycho encounters a thug, it still comes down to who did what.
If one serial killer kills another, one is still a perpetrator of a crime, one is a victim of a crime.
All that matters is what happened, and what can be proved.
I don't buy that Zimmerman was a psycho or that Martin was a thug.
None of that is relevant anyway.
Even if a psycho encounters a thug, it still comes down to who did what.
If one serial killer kills another, one is still a perpetrator of a crime, one is a victim of a crime.
All that matters is what happened, and what can be proved.
I don't buy that Zimmerman was a psycho or that Martin was a thug.
None of that is relevant anyway.
Even if a psycho encounters a thug, it still comes down to who did what.
If one serial killer kills another, one is still a perpetrator of a crime, one is a victim of a crime.
All that matters is what happened, and what can be proved.
I don't buy that Zimmerman was a psycho or that Martin was a thug.
None of that is relevant anyway.
Even if a psycho encounters a thug, it still comes down to who did what.
If one serial killer kills another, one is still a perpetrator of a crime, one is a victim of a crime.
All that matters is what happened, and what can be proved.
Experts claim voice on 911 cannot be Zimmerman
Trayvon Martin Shooting: Voice Experts Claim Teen's Cries, Not Zimmerman's, Can Be Heard On 911 Call
Well, the sixth paragraph totally contradicts the headline.
But it's another huffington post article, so accuracy and honesty really aren't part of the equation, are they?
I don't buy that Zimmerman was a psycho or that Martin was a thug.
None of that is relevant anyway.
Even if a psycho encounters a thug, it still comes down to who did what.
If one serial killer kills another, one is still a perpetrator of a crime, one is a victim of a crime.
All that matters is what happened, and what can be proved.
What truth?
very good question
Let's face it, there is nothing that is going to be acceptable at this point. The Sharpton/Jackson community will think there has been a whitewash unless we get that Zimmerman in prison or executed and the sooner the better. Then the other side is going to believe that any guilty finding was politically/racially motivated and therefore tainted. I assume there is no smoking gun at this point or we would have seen it. So there is never going to be a "truth" at this point. So was Bruno Hauptmann guilty or not?
If the truth comes out that Zimmerman is guilty things will be fine.
If the truth comes out that Zimmerman is not guilty all hell will break loose.