I find it odd how people can invest themselves in the truth or untruth of something they can't know about. I'm talking about people here on this thread.
I don't know what the truth is, but I have no investment in either outcome. It may turn out that the kid attacked Zimmerman, or that Zimmerman was a racist who set out to murder the kid. I don't know.
Why does anyone here have an investment in one set of facts over the other? Especially when we know so little.
You can't see blood in the video. Okay. There are a dozen possibilities about why you can't see blood. One of them is that there was never any blood. That's not the only one, though. With no knowledge whatsoever, why pick a particular reason and argue that one?
What this situation reveals more than most is the bias people bring to it.
I think people are more invested in being right than anything else.