hornadylnl
Shooter
- Nov 19, 2008
- 21,505
- 63
Well then let's see them prove Z started the fight. That will be kind of hard to do since his word is all there is. Would you really convict him for murder sans any direct evidence that HE started the fight? It appears to me you would.
I would bet that you've told a lie at some point in your life too, over something far more trivial. Everybody has. So what would that make your word, or anyone's word for that matter, worth?
I've said many times I would not convict with the evidence we have. In the end, a juror's decision is nothing more than his personal opinion. I can't prove that Zimmerman started the fight just the same as you can't prove that Martin started it. But I bet I've read 20 different posters say hundreds of times that Martin started it as if it were fact.