No, he wasn't.I stated that he was with someone that was underage because that was what started the tussle.
No, he wasn't.I stated that he was with someone that was underage because that was what started the tussle.
No, he wasn't.
No, he wasn't. Zimmerman was born on October 5, 1983. The arrest was July 18, 2005. He was 21 yrs. 9 mos. old.1. Zimmerman was underage at the time of his 2005 arrest.
I wrote, "Zimmerman wasn't there drinking with an underage friend.' That neither states Zimmerman was nor was not drinking, just that he wasn't there drinking with underage friends. And he wasn't.2. You were the one that stated he was drinking.
OMFG!3. You win the Internetz simply based on the fact I don't think you can comprehend a single word you read.
See, posting stuff like this just makes you look foolish.
In 2005 Zimmerman was in a bar having a drink with a friend. Unbeknownst to them an undercover sting operation was going on inside the bar with police officers/ATF posing as patrons to catch bar operators selling alcohol to minors.
Okay, I did write that in that post. I had forgotten I wrote that so I was wrong saying I didn't. Mea culpa. Which I guess was silly of me to argue about in the first place since he was, I just forgot I wrote that and I thought you were just continuing to make stuff up.I'll admit that I read a bad source regarding his DOB. But once again, you (as quoted above) were the one that stated he was in the bar drinking with a friend.
Okay, I did write that in that post. I had forgotten I wrote that so I was wrong saying I didn't. Mea culpa. Which I guess was silly of me to argue about in the first place since he was, I just forgot I wrote that and I thought you were just continuing to make stuff up.
Friends?
The point in this case is who committed the illegal act? Who attacked whom?
So your defense of your comments on this thread is pointing out examples in another thread?
So basically because someone else does something (even if its wrong) it should be ok for you to do it as well is how you are wishing to defend your comments about the woman.
Interesting.
So then because some people have successfully robbed banks, it should be fine for you to rob a bank as well. It is the same basic premiss.
Okay, I did write that in that post. I had forgotten I wrote that so I was wrong saying I didn't. Mea culpa. Which I guess was silly of me to argue about in the first place since he was, I just forgot I wrote that and I thought you were just continuing to make stuff up.
Friends?
The point in this case is who committed the illegal act? Who attacked whom? Did Trayvon attack Zimmerman or did Zimmerman attack Trayvon?
So you are saying it wasn't stolen and the police let him keep it?
Also I see you glossed over the point that Zimmerman wasn't there drinking with an underage friend like you asserted. His friend was the bartender.
Still, nothing that happened seven years ago changes the facts of this case. Who physically assaulted who?
Maybe this is why it costs $50k to live in hiding.
George Zimmerman's prison calls show plans with wife Shellie to pay off bills | World news | guardian.co.uk
"Transcripts of the calls made by the accused murderer from Florida's Seminole County jail in April include instructions to his wife, Shellie, to "pay everything totally off", including credit cards from American Express and Sam's Club and some money owed to his mother."
"I even paid, like, your mom, 'cause you knew you were paying her monthly. I, uh, I even paid my school."
I wonder if those who donated knew they were paying for his wife's school.
Since legal bills caused by this case will probably dog this couple for the rest of their lives, I'm not surprised they opted to clear the financial decks, so to speak.
He said on his site that he'd be accountable for all donations. Is paying off credit cards and his wife's schooling what his supporters had in mind?
I also like his hoodie comment to his wife in the transcripts.
He said on his site that he'd be accountable for all donations. Is paying off credit cards and his wife's schooling what his supporters had in mind?
I also like his hoodie comment to his wife in the transcripts.
I think, if I see some guy following me as I walk down the street, I'm going to beat him to death for making me nervous.
That seems to be okay with a lot of people these days.
I'm willing to let him be human and fallible, and I expect that his commitment to being accountable for all funds donated to him for his legal defense is something he will live up to. As I said, he'll be paying off his legal bills long after his legal defense fund dries up.
So is treating people like criminals with zero evidence.
What would be the INGO opinion if Martin's mother sold t shirts to pay for her son's funeral expenses? Remember how terrible she was for even filing for the copyrights with zero evidence of her trying to sell a single thing? I still have yet to hear the first report of her trying to sell anything or a single apology for the things said about her copyright application.
I've personally written the checks for 2 funerals and I know how expensive they are. How many here have $10-15k lying around to pay for an unexpected funeral? Would she be justified in having a fundraiser to pay for those expenses?