Nope, no sarcasm at all. Based on everything we have learned about him, he is just a punk kid with an attitude.
I was talking about all the things he was thrown out of school for. Drugs, stolen jewelry, and vandalism.I hate those punk kids that go to the store for skittles and tea. Geraldo called him a thug because of his clothing so it has to be true. That is enough evidence for me...Geraldo said it. Bring the kid back to life so we can fry him for wearing a hoodie and walking to the store.
I was talking about all the things he was thrown out of school for. Drugs, stolen jewelry, and vandalism.
I hate those punk kids that go to the store for skittles and [STRIKE]tea[/STRIKE] Watermelon Juice Cocktail.
Tea doesn't make good "Lean"
See, posting stuff like this just makes you look foolish.Zimmerman also qualifies as a thug. "Resisting an officer with violence" and "battery of law enforcement officer".
Trayvon had stolen jewelry in his possession, a bunch of women's wedding rings, etc. He wasn't caught in anyone's house, if that's what you mean.The stolen jewelry thing, Miami-Dade PD denied that Martin was tied to a jewelry theft.
See, posting stuff like this just makes you look silly.
In 2005 Zimmerman was in a bar having a drink with a friend. Unbeknownst to them an undercover sting operation was going on inside the bar with police officers/ATF posing as patrons to catch bar operators selling alcohol to minors.
An altercation between one of the undercover (regular clothes) officers and a friend of Zimmerman took place. Zimmerman thought his buddy was about to be in a bar fight so he interjected and pushed the guy away from his friend. It turns out the guy was part of the sting. Out of spite for the shove, and potentially frustration for no minor alcohol sales, they arrested Zimmerman and his pal.
That's the violent "battery on a police officer." He pushed a guy--who he didn't know was a LEO--away from his friend because he thought they were going to get into a fight. In my view, this actually shows he is non-violent because he tried to break up a fight by separating them, not start one. He didn't jump in and start pounding the guy.
The undercover guy got all butt-hurt over this. The charges were dropped.
Trayvon had stolen jewelry in his possession, a bunch of women's wedding rings, etc. He wasn't caught in anyone's house, if that's what you mean.
Wait, first you intimated that Zimmerman got into a fight with a cop by saying he commited violent battery on a peace officer. Now you agree that he actually just tried to stop two people from fighting in the first place, one who was hiding the fact that he was a LEO.Sorry but going to a bar with underage friends is what sparked the shoving match.
I'm wondering how much you know about judges issuing restraining orders in a domestic situation. Still, Z is responsible for who he chose to date so I won't argue with you here.Mutual restraining orders with an ex-fiance because of domestic violence doesn't really lend itself to the non-violent
Show me where Miami-Dade said he wasn't in possession of stolen women's jewelry. I'll wait.Miami-Dade PD denied he was tied to the theft.
I don't know why you are getting all hung up over calling someone a thug. Trayvon wasn't shot because he possessed stolen jewelry or marijuana or committed vandalism. He was shot because he physically assaulted another person.Either they're both thugs, neither is a thug
I don't care if you want to call Zimmerman a thug. Go ahead. We're talking the law. What actions were done that were legal or illegal. If calling Z names makes you feel better, I'll help.anyone should be allowed to convict Zimmerman of being a thug as well
INGO is the pinnacle of class when it comes to comments on people. I make a cooment about Zimmerman's wife's mugshot and get blasted. Yet no one seems bothered by these comments.
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/break_room/219707-rip_rodney_king.html
Wait, first you intimated that Zimmerman got into a fight with a cop by saying he commited violent battery on a peace officer. Now you agree that he actually just tried to stop two people from fighting in the first place, one who was hiding the fact that he was a LEO.
Nice recovery.
I'm wondering how much you know about judges issuing restraining orders in a domestic situation. Still, Z is responsible for who he chose to date so I won't argue with you here.
Show me where Miami-Dade said he wasn't in possession of stolen women's jewelry. I'll wait.
I don't know why you are getting all hung up over calling someone a thug. Trayvon wasn't shot because he possessed stolen jewelry or marijuana or committed vandalism. He was shot because he physically assaulted another person.
Trayvon chose poorly. He won't do that again.
I don't care if you want to call Zimmerman a thug. Go ahead. We're talking the law. What actions were done that were legal or illegal. If calling Z names makes you feel better, I'll help.
George Zimmerman was a stupid, liberal, Obama slurping Democrat. He wasn't a gun guy, and had only purchased his Kel-Tec because the police had suggested he do that after problems with heighborhood dogs. I think his heart was in the right place, but he didn't make good decisions.
But who committed the illegal attack on the other? Z on T, or T on Z? That's what some here have a hard time grasping.
So you are saying it wasn't stolen and the police let him keep it?There hasn't been ANY evidence stating that the jewelry had ever been stolen.
Then we get to him making "lean."
So you are saying it wasn't stolen and the police let him keep it?
Also I see you glossed over the point that Zimmerman wasn't there drinking with an underage friend like you asserted. His friend was the bartender.
Still, nothing that happened seven years ago changes the facts of this case. Who physically assaulted who?
So the police let him keep his jewelry?the police didn't have enough evidence to say whether it was stolen or not.
Yes, you did. He wasn't.I stated he was at the bar with someone underage.
So the police let him keep his merchandise? Yes, you stated that. He wasn't.