To be honest, I would be surprised if Obama had a lower GPA. The guy graded onto the Harvard Law Review, so he is obviously a good student.
About not being known, yeah, it is weird. I don't think it is impossible, especially considering he transferred in, but it is strange.
Find me a viable third party candidate with a realistic shot and I will happily vote for one. Until that happens, I will vote for the major party candidate that I find least repulsive. Do I have to be happy about the options? Nope. But if I sit out or vote on a non-contender and the candidate...
All I mean to say is that the guy says he was an average A-/B+ student who did well but not great on the LSAT. Harvard is the best/second best law school in the whole country. B+/A- and "well but not great" on the LSAT doesn't get in. When I was applying to law schools, the LSAT score for...
They are the two realistic options we have. You can vote third party as a protest, but if you don't vote for the major candidate that you can stomach most easily, you are letting others decide who wins and doing very little to influence it yourself.
It isn't just the Dems that punish oil companies for making money. Local News | Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil | Seattle Times Newspaper
It isn't just Dems redistributing wealth. McCain Calls to Reform Pork Barrel Politics - washingtonpost.com (4,000 earmarks in '94...
I am more likely to practice if it is interactive and a game. I also feel like I practice better because there is consequence to half-assing it. Besides, IDPA is fun.
I forgot that this weekend is the Michigan City Rifle Club's IDPA match. I shoot that every month, so this weekend doesn't work as well as I thought. Does next weekend work for anyone instead?
Guilty of being a lawyer, sorry.
My view:
'Holy Matrimony' = My wife and I committing to each other in the eyes of God. A blessing by God, through a pastor, showing his hand in and approval of our relationship.
Marriage(tax benefits, property rights, etc) = a recognition of our living...
I imagine one of the main reasons bigamy isn't allowed is because of the benefits married couples get with regard to inheritence, visitation, medical decisions, property ownership and taxation. But it could also have something to do with harming undesireable males. :dunno:
Every other legal form is titled Party A/Party B or Plaintiff/Defendant. Contracts have been Party A/PartyB or Party 1/Party2 for as long as contracts have existed. Isn't removing the designation of Bride/Groom removing recognition of a special group, not creating it?
Bigamy hurts undesireable males. Undesireable males are, by and large, who write our laws. There is nothing inherently wrong with bigamy or communal marriages.